Corrosion never sleeps. It is the moisture, salt and chemicals that constantly attack metal surfaces whether it is a steel bridge, an offshore platform or factory equipment. Painting has long been the most popular form of protection but is it the most effective over the long run?
This article breaks down how painting stacks up against thermal spray coating and why more industries are choosing thermal spray as the stronger, longer-lasting defense against corrosion. Read on to learn more.
Industries are spending billions of dollars annually because of repairs or downtimes and lost productivity through corrosion. Just think rust is a mute robber; it deteriorates your property even when you are not even in sight. When the surface coating decays, it is just a matter of time before the decay extends. The right protection choice can be the solution between five years of repair and a 30year solution.
Let us clear up the fundamentals before comparison.
For a quick overview of processes and materials, see our Thermal Spraying Guide.
Painting forms a chemical shield between the metal and the environment. Gradually, this layer breaks and sheds its skin or becomes lightened by sun and changes in temperature and abrasion. When that occurs, the corrosion may begin beneath the paint.
Thermal spray coating forms a physical, mechanical bond. It does not simply cover the metal but it becomes a part of it. Metals such as zinc and aluminum or stainless steel are sprayed on to form a dense shell over the surface. This ensures that it is ideal in severe environments such as marine docks or pipelines and chemical plants.
Here’s a clear side-by-side look at how these two stack up.
|
Feature |
Thermal Spray Coating |
Painting |
|
Service Life
|
15–30+ years (material and environment dependent) |
3–10 years before recoating |
|
Bond Strength |
Mechanical (sometimes metallurgical) |
Chemical bond only |
|
Thickness |
150–500+ μm |
50–300 μm
|
|
Temperature Resistance |
Up to ~1000 °C+ (material dependent) |
Limited by resin (often < 200 °C) |
|
Damage Tolerance |
Local repairs hold well |
Damage often spreads under film |
|
Environmental Resistance |
Excellent in salt, chemicals, and heat |
Better for mild/moderate exposure |
|
Cost Over Time |
Higher upfront, lower lifecycle cost
|
Lower upfront, frequent repaints |
|
Best Use |
Bridges, offshore, pipelines, power plants |
Indoor or decorative applications |
Explore our full range of Thermal Spray coating products designed for different industrial needs.
It is tempting to use paint as it is less expensive in the short run but that is short-term thinking. Painted surfaces require sandblasting or surface preparation and several layers of repainting every few years. Those labor and material expenses accumulate fast.
Thermal spray coating can be more expensive in the short run though it can last three to five times longer. Thermal spray is an easy winner when you sum up the entire lifecycle cost: maintenance or labor and downtime. That is to say, you spend a single time and have decades of peace of mind.
Imagine you manage a steel bridge near the coast. A painted surface might hold up for five years before rust starts showing through. You’d need to shut down lanes, scrape, and repaint again and again.
Now imagine that same bridge coated with thermal spray coating. Zinc or aluminum layers act as a sacrificial shield, preventing rust even in salty air. It is possible to have that bridge last 25 years or longer with the proper sealing. This is the type of reliability infrastructure owners would love to have.
More companies are choosing thermal spray because they want results that last, not band-aid fixes. It’s become a favorite in:
Each of these industries faces punishing conditions where paint simply can’t keep up.
Let’s sum up why thermal spray stands out:
No wonder engineers call it the “industrial armor” for metal surfaces.
Consider it as follows: painting is comparable to purchasing an inexpensive umbrella, it will work temporarily, though you will continue to buy other umbrellas. Thermal spray coating can be compared to the high qualitative raincoat, which can serve several years long.
In the case of large-scale assets, it is not only convenient but profitable to reduce downtimes and maintenance. That’s why smart asset managers are switching to thermal spray. They’re not chasing the cheapest fix; they’re choosing the solution that saves money over time.
As far as corrosion protection is concerned, there is no doubt about the winner. Thermal spray coating is more cost-effective, has better adhesion, and durability compared to painting. It is not the most cost efficient in the short run, but it is certainly the smartest decision in the long term.
If you are sick of repainting or fixing and delaying; it's time to switch strategies. Find a permanent solution and not a retouch. It is time to select the protection that is really durable.
CY Thermal Spray Coating has been assisting industries all over the world in preventing corrosion for more than 40 years. Our custom coating also ensures that your equipment will be stronger, longer and prepared to face the most difficult conditions. Reach out today to find the best coating plan for your project because your assets deserve the strongest defense.
Question 1. Is thermal spray coating better than painting for corrosion protection?
Answer: Yes. Thermal spray coating is much more durable and it is able to operate in rough conditions where paint would crack or peel. It forms a strong mechanical bond and offers up to five times more service life.
Question 2. Can thermal spray coating be applied over old paint?
Answer: It is better to take the old paint off. The surface must be smooth and coarse to be adhered to. Before spraying, the technicians of CY can assist with the preparation and evaluation of the surface.
Question 3. How long does thermal spray coating last compared to paint?
Answer: Compared to paint that can last 3-10 years, thermal spray coating has the potential to last up to 20-30 years without having to be repaired thus making it the wiser long run decision.